đŸ§‘â€đŸ«Schiff Could Face Fines, Prison Time if Classified Leak Allegations Proven

- by cheaunratana - Leave a Comment

A Democrat whistleblower’s allegations, backed by newly declassified FBI interview reports, are now threatening to upend the political career of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA). If the whistleblower’s account is accurate and prosecutors pursue the case, Schiff could face not only career-ending political consequences but also staggering financial penalties and lengthy prison terms.

Advertisement

As Tolman noted, the legal exposure could multiply quickly: “It depends on the counts in the indictment
 The fine is up to $250,000 for every leak that’s charged.”

The claims date back to Schiff’s time in the U.S. House, when he served as the ranking member — and later chairman — of the House Intelligence Committee during the Trump–Russia investigation.

The whistleblower, who worked for Democrats on the committee for more than a decade, repeatedly told the FBI starting in 2017 that Schiff had authorized leaking classified intelligence to the media to damage then-President Donald Trump.

The whistleblower said that in an all-staff meeting, Schiff declared that “the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. Trump” and that the leaks “would be used to indict President Trump.”

Advertisement

The whistleblower claimed he immediately objected, telling Schiff the plan was “unethical and possibly treasonous,” but was assured by others that “we would not be caught leaking classified information.”

The source informed federal agents that Schiff believed he had received a promise to become the CIA Director should Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election. The whistleblower identified Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) as a likely conduit for the leaks and said he was abruptly fired after raising the issue with the FBI.

Advertisement

Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the whistleblower says FBI leadership, including Director Christopher Wray, did nothing. He claims to have repeated the same account to agents from the bureau’s St. Louis office in 2023, again with no action taken.

Now, former U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman is warning of the potential penalties Schiff could face if prosecutors were to bring charges. In a conversation with political commentator Benny Johnson, Tolman explained that leaking classified information carries steep financial and criminal penalties.

“Yeah. I mean, the fine is up to $250,000 for every leak that’s charged, so it depends on the counts in the indictment,” Tolman told Johnson. “Also, keep in mind, some of the punishment hinges on the purpose of the classified leak or the possession of classified documentation illegally. The purpose becomes very important.”

Tolman said the context of the leak could prove decisive in determining punishment.

“I believe this was, in essence, the beginning of a conspiracy to take down a president, to impact his ability to lead,” he said. “There are other statutes — conspiracy statutes, interference with official proceedings, et cetera. A lot of people have a question about treason — ‘Is it treason?’ You probably don’t satisfy the elements for treason, but there are some related crimes that could come into play.”

Tolman added that if prosecutors found an intent “to undermine the United States,” the penalties could reach “up to 20 years in federal prison.”

The FBI’s inaction on the allegations fits into what critics describe as a pattern under Director Wray of shielding politically connected figures. Kash Patel, a former Trump administration official, has accused the bureau of ignoring serious misconduct while aggressively targeting political opponents.

Advertisement

Patel has pointed to the FBI’s use of confidential informants ahead of the Jan. 6 protests as proof that the agency had foreknowledge of events but failed to act appropriately.

Schiff has not yet issued a public response to the newly surfaced allegations. In the past, he has denied leaking classified material and characterized such claims as partisan attacks meant to discredit his oversight work.

Related Posts

💡NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Mamdani Flip Flops On Key Position Screenshot This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion. Far-left New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani said his view on the phrase “globalize the intifada” has changed as he appears to be changing his position to help him electorally. Advertisement Mamdani told MSNBC host Al Sharpton on “PoliticsNation” that he would now “discourage” others from using it. The 33-year-old Democratic Socialist said the shift came after a rabbi told him the phrase reminded her of bus bombings and restaurant attacks targeting Jews in Israel. He said there was a “gap in intent” between those who use the phrase to protest Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land and the way many Jews and pro-Israel New Yorkers hear it as a threat. The American Jewish Committee defines the phrase as a rallying cry for “aggressive resistance against Israel.” Sharpton noted some of his own past comments had been “misunderstood,” without giving examples. He pressed Mamdani on whether his “personal views” on intifada — mispronounced as “the intifitada” — have shifted. Advertisement Here is Mamdani’s full response: “When we won the primary election, I said on that stage that I know that millions of New Yorkers care deeply about what happens in Israel and Palestine — and I’m one of those New Yorkers. And I commit to reaching even further, to understand disagreement, to wrestle with the complexities of those differing viewpoints, because what this city deserves is a mayor that looks not only to represent the close to 600,000 New Yorkers that voted for me, but rather the 8.5 million people that call this city home,” the candidate said. Advertisement “And in the meetings that I have had since that moment, I’ve met with Jewish elected officials, with rabbis, with community leaders. And there was one rabbi that spoke to me about how that phrase, for her, brought back memories of bus bombings in Haifa, of restaurant attacks in Jerusalem. And I knew that from what she was sharing with me that she had a fear, as she said, that that could come home to New York City,” Mamdani said. “And so in having that conversation with her, I knew that the gap between the intent that I have heard some New Yorkers share with the use of that language, of calling for the end of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, was disconnected from the impact it was having in that same conversation I was having with that rabbi. So I have said, after having that conversation, that this is language I would discourage,” he said. The comments marked a departure from just weeks ago, when Mamdani told NBC’s Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press” that the phrase was “not language that I use.” At the time, he also stated that he did not view it as the role of a mayor to “police” speech. In July, the New York Times reported that Mamdani had told a closed-door gathering he would “discourage” the use of the phrase. Mamdani is the leading contender to replace Mayor Eric Adams (D). He has faced a busy stretch, appearing Friday on CNN with Abby Phillip, who questioned his proposal to open five government-run grocery stores. Mamdani recently hosted a Brooklyn town hall with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Sanders said he and Mamdani would “not allow” Elon Musk to become the world’s first trillionaire “if they have anything to do with it.” Advertisement “It’s important that we feel the outrage of children going hungry, people being homeless, 85 million without healthcare, [and] you got one guy — one guy — Mr. Musk, whose own wealth is more than the bottom 52% of American households,” the senator said. “You may have seen in the papers, they want to give him a little bonus —another $800 billion-$900 billion! We are living in crazy world! Millions of people struggling to put food on the table, and making one guy a trillionaire is insane, not about what this country is supposed to be about, and we are not going to allow that to happen,” he said.

💡NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Mamdani Flip Flops On Key Position Screenshot This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion. Far-left New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani said his view on the phrase “globalize the intifada” has changed as he appears to be changing his position to help him electorally. Advertisement Mamdani told MSNBC host Al Sharpton on “PoliticsNation” that he would now “discourage” others from using it. The 33-year-old Democratic Socialist said the shift came after a rabbi told him the phrase reminded her of bus bombings and restaurant attacks targeting Jews in Israel. He said there was a “gap in intent” between those who use the phrase to protest Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land and the way many Jews and pro-Israel New Yorkers hear it as a threat. The American Jewish Committee defines the phrase as a rallying cry for “aggressive resistance against Israel.” Sharpton noted some of his own past comments had been “misunderstood,” without giving examples. He pressed Mamdani on whether his “personal views” on intifada — mispronounced as “the intifitada” — have shifted. Advertisement Here is Mamdani’s full response: “When we won the primary election, I said on that stage that I know that millions of New Yorkers care deeply about what happens in Israel and Palestine — and I’m one of those New Yorkers. And I commit to reaching even further, to understand disagreement, to wrestle with the complexities of those differing viewpoints, because what this city deserves is a mayor that looks not only to represent the close to 600,000 New Yorkers that voted for me, but rather the 8.5 million people that call this city home,” the candidate said. Advertisement “And in the meetings that I have had since that moment, I’ve met with Jewish elected officials, with rabbis, with community leaders. And there was one rabbi that spoke to me about how that phrase, for her, brought back memories of bus bombings in Haifa, of restaurant attacks in Jerusalem. And I knew that from what she was sharing with me that she had a fear, as she said, that that could come home to New York City,” Mamdani said. “And so in having that conversation with her, I knew that the gap between the intent that I have heard some New Yorkers share with the use of that language, of calling for the end of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, was disconnected from the impact it was having in that same conversation I was having with that rabbi. So I have said, after having that conversation, that this is language I would discourage,” he said. The comments marked a departure from just weeks ago, when Mamdani told NBC’s Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press” that the phrase was “not language that I use.” At the time, he also stated that he did not view it as the role of a mayor to “police” speech. In July, the New York Times reported that Mamdani had told a closed-door gathering he would “discourage” the use of the phrase. Mamdani is the leading contender to replace Mayor Eric Adams (D). He has faced a busy stretch, appearing Friday on CNN with Abby Phillip, who questioned his proposal to open five government-run grocery stores. Mamdani recently hosted a Brooklyn town hall with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Sanders said he and Mamdani would “not allow” Elon Musk to become the world’s first trillionaire “if they have anything to do with it.” Advertisement “It’s important that we feel the outrage of children going hungry, people being homeless, 85 million without healthcare, [and] you got one guy — one guy — Mr. Musk, whose own wealth is more than the bottom 52% of American households,” the senator said. “You may have seen in the papers, they want to give him a little bonus —another $800 billion-$900 billion! We are living in crazy world! Millions of people struggling to put food on the table, and making one guy a trillionaire is insane, not about what this country is supposed to be about, and we are not going to allow that to happen,” he said.

💡NYC Mayoral Frontrunner Mamdani Flip Flops On Key Position

About cheaunratana

View all posts by cheaunratana →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *