CHICAGO, IL – In a move that has sent shockwaves through both the sports and corporate worlds, Chicago Sky star Angel Reese has reportedly turned down a massive $3 million sponsorship deal from Nike. Her reason? A blunt, unfiltered rejection of what she calls the brand’s “woke” agenda.
Speaking to reporters after practice, Reese didn’t mince words:
“I’d rather lose money than save a woke brand. My values aren’t for sale.”
The statement has ignited a firestorm of debate, with some praising Reese for standing by her principles, and others accusing her of making a reckless, politically charged move that could damage her career.
Insiders say the deal was nearly finalized before Reese’s team abruptly walked away. According to sources close to the negotiations, she expressed discomfort with Nike’s recent ad campaigns and corporate stances on hot-button social issues, telling associates she “didn’t want her name used to push agendas she doesn’t believe in.”
Nike has yet to issue an official statement, but company representatives are said to be “deeply disappointed” and “scrambling” to assess how the public fallout could impact future endorsements. Some marketing analysts warn that Reese’s rejection could embolden other athletes to question — or outright refuse — brand deals based on political or cultural disagreements.
On social media, hashtags like #StandWithReese and #BoycottNike began trending within hours, while critics launched their own counter-tag, #ReeseBlewIt.
Whether you see it as a bold stand or a costly misstep, one thing is certain: Angel Reese has drawn a clear line in the sand — and both the sports world and corporate America are paying attention. The question now is whether Nike will respond with quiet damage control or an all-out PR counterattack.
